The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants

Virginia D. Driscoll

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1329230

Seminars in Hearing, Table of Contents

Semin Hear 2012; 33(04): 410-418
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329230

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants

Authors

Virginia D. Driscoll

¹Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa

Abstract

This study examines the efficiency and effectiveness of three types of training on recognition of musical instruments by adults with cochlear implants (CI). Seventy-one adults with CIs were randomly assigned to one of three training conditions: feedback on response accuracy, feedback-plus (response accuracy plus correct answer), and direct instruction. Each participant completed three training sessions per week over a five-week time period in which they listened to recorded excerpts of eight different musical instruments. Results showed significant pre-to-posttest improvement in music instrument recognition accuracy for all three training conditions (22.9–25.7%, p < 0.0001). Time when tested (week), bilateral CI use, and age were significant predictors of performance. Participants who wore bilateral implants scored significantly higher than participants with unilateral implants at all three time points; hearing aid use was not a significant predictor. These results may have practical implications for numerous types of auditory rehabilitation for persons who use CIs.

Keywords

cochlear implant - music - training - auditory rehabilitation

Full Text

References

References
1 Gfeller K, Lansing CR. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34 (4) 916-920
2 Gfeller K, Knutson JF, Woodworth G, Witt S, DeBus B. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9 (1) 1-19
3 Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, Mehr MA, Knutson JF. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 111 (4) 349-356
4 Fujita S, Ito J. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108 (7 Pt 1) 634-640
5 Pressnitzer D, Bestel J, Fraysse B. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005; 1060: 343-345
6 Gfeller K, Mehr M, Witt S. Aural rehabilitation of music perception and enjoyment of adult cochlear implant users. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 2001; 34: 17-27
7 Gfeller K, Oleson J, Knutson JF, Breheny P, Driscoll V, Olszewski C. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol 2008; 19 (2) 120-134
8 Gfeller K, Jiang D, Oleson JJ, Driscoll V, Knutson JF. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21 (1) 28-34
9 Schön D, Magne C, Besson M. The music of speech: music training facilitates pitch processing in both music and language. Psychophysiology 2004; 41 (3) 341-349
10 Gfeller K, Witt S, Kim K, Adamek M, Coffman D. Preliminary report of a computerized music training program for adult cochlear implant recipients. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1999; 32: 11-27
11 Gfeller K, Witt S, Adamek M , et al. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13 (3) 132-145
12 Boothroyd A. Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21 (9) 601-611
13 Gfeller K, Witt S, Stordahl J, Mehr M. The effects of training on melody recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant recipients. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 2000; 33: 115-138
14 Galvin III JJ, Fu QJ, Nogaki G. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (3) 302-319
15 Martin JS, Jerger JF. Some effects of aging on central auditory processing. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42 (4) (Suppl. 02) 25-44
16 Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons PJ. Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38 (5) 1150-1156
17 Driscoll VD, Oleson J, Jiang D, Gfeller K. Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20 (1) 71-82
18 Looi V, She J. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (2) 116-128
19 Philips B, Vinck B, De Vel E , et al. Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269 (3) 813-821
20 Robinson K, Summerfield AQ. Adult auditory learning and training. Ear Hear 1996; 17 (3, Suppl) 51S-65S
21 Fu QJ. Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Neuroreport 2002; 13 (13) 1635-1639
22 Raaijmakers JGW. Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: Application of the SAM model. Cogn Sci 2003; 27: 431-452
23 Pavlik Jr PI, Anderson JR. Practice and forgetting effects on vocabulary memory: an activation-based model of the spacing effect. Cogn Sci 2005; 29 (4) 559-586
24 Driscoll VD, Oleson J, Gfeller K. The effects of training on timbre recognition for CI users. Paper presented at: 11^th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Auditory Technologies; July 3, 2010; Stockholm, Sweden.